<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Regarding the naval range rules</title>
        <link>http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/topic/8718/t/Regarding-the-naval-range-rules.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ First let me commend the admin for these excellent rules - bravo!!! I assume, though the rules did not state this explicitly that non-combat range is only when
a force of ships is assigned the CRUSE order and the other ranges are for all other types of orders. Is this accurate? ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:25:08 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 00:40:21 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Regarding the naval range rules ]]></title>
			<link>http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/reply/18471/t/Regarding-the-naval-range-rules.html#reply-18471</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Seriously people, let&#39;s take a chill pill and grow up. Stop referring to Frankenfur as &quot;German player&quot; as it sounds really stupid and immature.
Just play the game. For christ&#39;s sake, this forum is starting to look more and more like superpower classic and if we can&#39;t all act sensibly then I
have plenty of other hobbies to occupy what spare time I have.
<br>
<br>
And Kara, not to pick a bone but it probably would have been more appropriate to PM Dylan about your naval... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Ulo988)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/sreply/18471</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 00:40:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Regarding the naval range rules ]]></title>
			<link>http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/reply/18469/t/Regarding-the-naval-range-rules.html#reply-18469</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I, like everyone else not directly involved is sitting on the sidelines and watching. I cannot speak for the rest of us in that category, but each of us must
assume at some time if we try to project naval forces, we need to know how they work. Using the exmaple before us to undertsand that is just common sense. I am
sorry if it ruffles your feathers or you consider me a poor sport for postulating in public but that is my right to do so. Do you mean to imply if I sent you a
PM of this you... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Kara Stormcloud)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/sreply/18469</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 23:52:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Regarding the naval range rules ]]></title>
			<link>http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/reply/18468/t/Regarding-the-naval-range-rules.html#reply-18468</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Lol. Don&#39;t get onto Kara German player. So far you&#39;ve been as easy to predict as a yoke of oxen and nearly as easy to play as a pawnshop guitar. I am
fairly well aware of where you can go and how because I can figure out the distance between points. :P
<br>
<br>
Lol ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (King Francis)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/sreply/18468</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 23:36:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Regarding the naval range rules ]]></title>
			<link>http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/reply/18467/t/Regarding-the-naval-range-rules.html#reply-18467</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The problem with what you just did, Kara, was you gave him a list of possible ports and things that I could be using. Francis&#39; inability to understand that
the rules are operable, or on that matter his inability to understand anything in this thread is his own fault. We do not need to provide him with information
and insight into how I am conducting this war. He doesn&#39;t need to know if I have to move through Formosa, or if I have other targets I can hit from where I
am located. Giving... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Frankenfur)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/sreply/18467</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 22:55:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Regarding the naval range rules ]]></title>
			<link>http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/reply/18466/t/Regarding-the-naval-range-rules.html#reply-18466</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Based on this information of the Triple Alliance using a &quot;friendly&quot; base within 1,000 miles, the &quot;friendly&quot; port must be either a port
within the Philippines curtesy of Spain, a friendly Chinese port, which would be understandable considering the circumstances or in exteme southern Korea.
<br>
<br>
According to the aid listed in the rules, the extreme southern most portion of Formosa is 1,273.811 miles as the crow flies, which rules out any of the Dutch
ports.
<br>
<br>
I... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Kara Stormcloud)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/sreply/18466</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 22:19:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Regarding the naval range rules ]]></title>
			<link>http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/reply/18465/t/Regarding-the-naval-range-rules.html#reply-18465</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  If the German player cant reach Formosa from Batavia, how the heck did he reach the Pacific from the Baltic?
  <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I already explained this. If you&#39;d like, I can draw a map for you next week.
<br>
<br>

<blockquote>
  Im sorry German player, but if there are loopholes or exceptions to the rules as they concern this Pacific War then I and every other player has as much
  right to know them as you and your triple alliance.
</blockquote>For the last time,... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (perspixx)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/sreply/18465</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 21:43:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Regarding the naval range rules ]]></title>
			<link>http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/reply/18462/t/Regarding-the-naval-range-rules.html#reply-18462</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  &quot;Dylan, and I, believe this situation resolved. You don&#39;t need to know how I got to the Pacific, nor do you need to know how I&#39;ll be waging the
  war now because of these rule changes. These explanations you&#39;re not supposed to know.&quot;
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
How freakin sweet, but the issue isnt resolved until I understand as clearly whats going on as everyone else does.
<br>
<br>
If there were no compromises what would prompt the German player to say there... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (King Francis)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/sreply/18462</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 20:52:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Regarding the naval range rules ]]></title>
			<link>http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/reply/18460/t/Regarding-the-naval-range-rules.html#reply-18460</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  First off, to start with, I interpreted the rules fairly closely to the way they are now specified as evidenced by conversations I have had with various
  players about how badly I could hurt Germany and vice versa . I assumed the ranges were a bit more than they are but still. I have assumed that even to get
  into the Pacific Germany has had to secretly reach agreements with France or Great Britain or Spain to use their ports to get into the Pacific. Perhaps this
  is not the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (perspixx)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/sreply/18460</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 12:31:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Regarding the naval range rules ]]></title>
			<link>http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/reply/18459/t/Regarding-the-naval-range-rules.html#reply-18459</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ There is no controversy.
<br>
<br>
No exception is being made for the Triple Alliance-Japan war. The Triple Alliance players assumed that the rule change would prevent them from operating around
Formosa. It will not, nor will it stop them from expanding their war in the future.
<br>
<br>
Naval bases provide ammunition, maintenance, crew replacements and tactical infrastructure that aren&#39;t available at civilian ports. Warships must start and
end their turn at a naval base, but during a... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (perspixx)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/sreply/18459</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 12:14:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Regarding the naval range rules ]]></title>
			<link>http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/reply/18455/t/Regarding-the-naval-range-rules.html#reply-18455</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Francis does have a point.  Both sides need to have all the details about this &quot;compromise&quot;.  All that is being said is that forces around Formosa
are exempt.  What exactly does that mean? TA forces can only reach Formosa? Where in Formosa? They can only reach the Formosa area? What does that mean? I
think it would be really wise to make sure both sides understand exactly what this compromise entails, or this issue might comeback with a vengence in a turn
or two. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (schmid3)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/sreply/18455</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 11:26:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Regarding the naval range rules ]]></title>
			<link>http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/reply/18452/t/Regarding-the-naval-range-rules.html#reply-18452</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ ah heck the issue is already decided. My main concern was making sure I understood your post Frankenfur. Anything after that was just my .02 cents. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (TheDesertFox1)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/sreply/18452</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 11:05:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Regarding the naval range rules ]]></title>
			<link>http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/reply/18449/t/Regarding-the-naval-range-rules.html#reply-18449</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I&#39;m just going to let Dylan argue this. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Frankenfur)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/sreply/18449</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 10:21:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Regarding the naval range rules ]]></title>
			<link>http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/reply/18447/t/Regarding-the-naval-range-rules.html#reply-18447</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  The war will conduct under these rules, except concerning Formosa, where my fleet before could reach but under these rules couldn&#39;t.
</blockquote>So the range rules do not apply to forces operating around Formosa?  Perhaps I just misread what you posted Frenkenfur.  If that is the case then
I apologize and you can disregard the rest of my post.
<br>
<br>
If the agreement reached was that forces involved around Formosa are exempt from the new range rules, that isn&#39;t... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (TheDesertFox1)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/sreply/18447</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 09:05:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Regarding the naval range rules ]]></title>
			<link>http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/reply/18446/t/Regarding-the-naval-range-rules.html#reply-18446</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Ulo speak with my on AIM or MSN regarding your concerns -- I can shed some much needed light upon them. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (RevengeInu)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/sreply/18446</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 06:06:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Regarding the naval range rules ]]></title>
			<link>http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/reply/18444/t/Regarding-the-naval-range-rules.html#reply-18444</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Ok, I am sorry, but I am still confused. If I had known that our war was contriscted only to Formosa there is now way in hell I would have become a part of
this fiasco. It not just about how you got to the pacific. I have a fairly large stake in this that as far as I know has been wasted. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Ulo988)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/sreply/18444</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 01:51:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Regarding the naval range rules ]]></title>
			<link>http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/reply/18443/t/Regarding-the-naval-range-rules.html#reply-18443</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ What is said between me and Dylan is private. What I know and you don&#39;t, and thus ask Dylan questions concerning that, is relevant only to me. The facts
that they may perhaps be about you may not make you happy, but there are, once again, things I know that you are not, at this moment, privy to. Thus, you
won&#39;t be getting any transparency. You will not know what&#39;s been said, or when.
<br>
<br>
However, there is no conspiracy against you, which I am of the belief you think. The... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Frankenfur)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/sreply/18443</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 01:21:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Regarding the naval range rules ]]></title>
			<link>http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/reply/18442/t/Regarding-the-naval-range-rules.html#reply-18442</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Ive been sitting here watching this whole thing unfold and trying to decide what to do and say about it. Getting gradually angrier .
<br>
<br>
First off, to start with, I interpreted the rules fairly closely to the way they are now specified as evidenced by conversations I have had with various
players about how badly I could hurt Germany and vice versa . I assumed the ranges were a bit more than they are but still. I have assumed that even to get
into the Pacific Germany has had to secretly... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (King Francis)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/sreply/18442</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:42:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Regarding the naval range rules ]]></title>
			<link>http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/reply/18440/t/Regarding-the-naval-range-rules.html#reply-18440</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ hip
<br>
<br>
hip
<br>
<br>
hoo-ray!
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Olivia Clemens)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/sreply/18440</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:38:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Regarding the naval range rules ]]></title>
			<link>http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/reply/18439/t/Regarding-the-naval-range-rules.html#reply-18439</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ For all purposes, the situation&#39;s been dealt with fairly. No objections, and I just wish to reiterate to make clear that I agree the rules are both
necessary and good. I just wanted to be able to operate the war under the conditions that existed before these rules were made, that would make the war
inoperable before. As we&#39;ve compromised, all is well. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Frankenfur)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/sreply/18439</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:54:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Regarding the naval range rules ]]></title>
			<link>http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/reply/18437/t/Regarding-the-naval-range-rules.html#reply-18437</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I don&#39;t have to grandfather anything. The Triple Alliance has a way to reach Formosa under the new rules; I already talked to Frank about it, and about
other potential targets. I consider this resolved. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (perspixx)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/sreply/18437</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:23:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Regarding the naval range rules ]]></title>
			<link>http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/topic/8718/t/Regarding-the-naval-range-rules.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ First let me commend the admin for these excellent rules - bravo!!! I assume, though the rules did not state this explicitly that non-combat range is only when
a force of ships is assigned the CRUSE order and the other ranges are for all other types of orders. Is this accurate? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Kara Stormcloud)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gamegoddess.yuku.com/topic/8718</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:25:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>